Skip to main content

Reply to this post | See parent post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: AltheaRose Date: Jun 13, 2014 9:00pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: the need for schitck

LOL, exactly.

Except that I like patchouli. I actually still wear it. I'm sorry.

Of course, there always was a kind of uniform. It was so uncool to have designer jeans (back when that was a new concept, LOL) that I actually bought a pair just to be contrary. With a little gold disco belt. I thought it was funny. OK, I didn't actually wear it to Dead shows.

IMO the Requisite Bright Tie-Dye shtick appeared when so much time had passed between the crowd and the '60s that it was truly into the Next Generation. The sensibility had changed. It changed within a continuum, but it changed.

Of course in retrospect, My Generation also had a bit to answer for, fashion-wise. Here we are in full 1978 glory. (This is from the Duke show.)

dce45da157c870c1b0b8a14d8d90987a.jpg

Of course, lest the Touchheads think we totally dropped the ball fashion-wise, here's the usual summer uniform. It's from Oregon in Summer '82. The guy in the foreground is very Deadhead Fashion Forward in his baggy pants; wouldn't have seen that earlier. But he did get the memo about coming without a shirt. (Tie dye shirts? WHAT shirts?!?)

The required female peasant/Indian skirt stayed pretty much the same over the years. That's because it was a good choice then and it's a good choice now.

1cd46bb6fd111a042362b807155bcbd4.jpg




This post was modified by AltheaRose on 2014-06-14 04:00:10

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: micah6vs8 Date: Jun 13, 2014 9:12pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: the need for schitck

Of course we Touchheads were (by far ;-) the most fashionable crop of heads: nobody burned through Mommy and Daddy's money quite like we did. It's hard to be a trustafarian.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: AltheaRose Date: Jun 14, 2014 12:21am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: the need for schitck

I suspect there are jam festival "boho" trustafarians who took your example and go you one better. Or 10 better.

Actually, when the second-wave (third-wave?) hippies and Touchheads came along in the mid/late 80s, it seemed like a natural evolution and a really positive sign about the staying power of the counterculture. At least that's how I thought of it at the time, and I still think that's about right. It's easy to be snarky about all the doo-dads and accessories -- and the trustafarian aspect is funny in every generation I guess; at least DH trustafarians were better than the preppy ones -- but my only real critique is when that style is imagined as somehow being "60s" or an Eternal Deadhead Thing. I'm too much of a historical purist for that :-)

It does seem that the rainbow-colored accessorized glamor of the lot increased in direct proportion to the decline of the band. It happened with band posters, too. They were fantastic by '95, LOL.


Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: SocialSecurityService Date: Jun 14, 2014 5:09am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: the need for schitck

I don't entirely agree, but that's your point of view.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: SpacedAgain Date: Jun 14, 2014 9:30pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: the need for schitck

I thought you could wear anything and made some odd choices of stuff found around SF. Eventually, I decided that those without tie dye stood out for stares, which was esp uncomfortable when intake timing was off.

So tie dye became preferable, fun to find cool designs, and let me pretend I was another fold in reality in the tantric sea of color.